Jeremy A. Lieberman is Pomerantz’s Co-Managing Partner with Patrick Dahlstrom. Jeremy became associated with the Firm in August 2004, and became a partner in January 2010. In 2018, he was honored as a “Titan of the Plaintiffs Bar” by Law360. He has been named a Super Lawyers® “Top-Rated Securities Litigation Attorney” in 2016, 2017, and 2018 – a recognition bestowed on no more than 5% of eligible attorneys in the New York Metro area. The Legal 500, in honoring Pomerantz as a Leading Firm for 2016 and 2017, stated that in New York, “Jeremy Lieberman is super impressive – a formidable adversary for any defense firm.”
Jeremy led the litigation in In re Petrobras Securities Litigation, a closely-watched securities class action arising from a multi-billion dollar kickback and bribery scheme involving Brazil’s largest oil company, Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. – Petrobras, in which Pomerantz was sole Lead Counsel. The biggest instance of corruption in the history of Brazil ensnared not only Petrobras' former executives but also Brazilian politicians, including former president Lula da Silva and one-third of the Brazilian Congress. In January and February 2018, Jeremy achieved a historic $3 billion settlement for the Class. This is not only the largest securities class action settlement in a decade, but is the largest settlement ever in a securities class action involving a foreign issuer, the fifth-largest securities class action settlement ever achieved in the United States, the largest securities class action settlement achieved by a foreign Lead Plaintiff, and the largest securities class action settlement in history not involving a restatement of financial reports.
Jeremy also secured a significant victory for Petrobras investors at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, when the court rejected the heightened ascertainability requirement for obtaining class certification that had been imposed by the Third Circuit Courts of Appeals. The ruling will have a positive impact on plaintiffs in securities fraud litigation.
Jeremy is Lead Counsel in a putative securities class action that alleges Barclays PLC misled institutional investors about the manipulation of the banking giant’s so-called “dark pool” trading systems in order to provide a trading advantage to high-frequency traders over its institutional investor clients. This case turns on the duty of integrity owed by Barclays to its clients. In November 2017, he achieved precedent-setting victories for investors, when the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that direct evidence of price impact is not always necessary to demonstrate market efficiency to invoke the presumption of reliance, and that defendants seeking to rebut the presumption of reliance must do so by a preponderance of the evidence rather than merely meeting a burden of production.
Jeremy has had an integral role in a number of high-profile securities class and derivative actions, including In re Comverse Technology, Inc. Securities Litigation, in which he and his partners achieved a historic $225 million settlement on behalf of the Class, which was the second-largest options backdating settlement to date.
Jeremy also serves as Lead Counsel in a number of the most high-profile securities class actions pending in the U.S. courts, such as In re Mylan N.V. Securities Litigation, In re Perrigo Co. Securities Litigation, In re Yahoo!, Inc. Securities Litigation and In re Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. Securities Litigation. He is Lead Counsel in the Firm’s case against Corinthian Colleges, one of the largest for-profit college systems in the country, for alleged misrepresentations about its job placement rates, compliance with applicable regulations, and enrollment statistics. Pomerantz prevailed in the motion to dismiss proceedings, a particularly noteworthy victory because Chief Judge George King of the Central District of California had dismissed two prior lawsuits against Corinthian with similar allegations.
Jeremy serves as Interim Class Counsel on behalf of a class lenders and financial institutions litigating claims arising out of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) rate rigging scandal. He was Lead Counsel in In re Medicis Corp. Securities Litigation, in which the court approved an $18 million settlement, and is Lead Counsel in a number of the Firm’s other litigations.
In In re China North East Petroleum Corp. Securities Litigation, Jeremy achieved a significant victory for shareholders in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, whereby the Appeals Court ruled that a temporary rise in share price above its purchase price in the aftermath of a corrective disclosure did not eviscerate an investor’s claim for damages. The Second Circuit’s decision was deemed “precedential” by the New York Law Journal, and provides critical guidance for assessing damages in a § 10(b) action.
Jeremy regularly consults with Pomerantz’s international institutional clients, including pension funds, regarding their rights under the U.S. securities laws. Jeremy is working with the Firm’s international clients to craft a response to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Morrison v. National Australia Bank, Ltd., which limited the ability of foreign investors to seek redress under the federal securities laws. Currently, Jeremy is representing several UK and EU pension funds and asset managers in individual actions against BP plc in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
Jeremy is a frequent lecturer regarding current corporate governance and securities litigation issues. In March 2017, he spoke at the ICGN conference in Washington D.C., regarding recent trends in foreign securities litigation. He also recently led a discussion regarding U.S. securities class actions in Paris, France.
Jeremy graduated from Fordham University School of Law in 2002. While in law school, he served as a staff member of the Fordham Urban Law Journal. Upon graduation, he began his career at a major New York law firm as a litigation associate, where he specialized in complex commercial litigation.
Jeremy is admitted to practice in the State of New York; the U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, the Southern District of Texas, the District of Colorado, the Eastern District of Michigan and Northern District of Illinois; the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits; and the United States Supreme Court.